incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Do we need a disclaimer? (Storm)
Date Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:02:01 GMT
Also, if it's not an Apache release, it probaly should not be hosted and
listed at Apache to avoid confusion.

On Thursday, November 14, 2013, Ted Dunning wrote:

> First few words should read "A disclaimer ..."
>
> I blame a combo of jet lag and *really* slow net link.  Not the guy who hit
> send without proofing, of course.
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I disclaimer to clarify that the 0.9.0 release is neither an Apache
> > top-level project release nor an Apache incubator release is probably
> good.
> >  A file name like DISCLAIMER might be good.
> >
> > I would worry about it being clear rather than being totally crafted by a
> > true legal mind.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:48 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> The Strom project is just entering the incubator. We have promised our
> >> community that we will issue a stable 0.9.0 release prior to switching
> over
> >> to the Apache release process. We are currently in a release candidate
> >> process.
> >>
> >> Now that we are an Incubator project, but not yet releasing under the
> >> Apache process, should we be including a disclaimer with our pre-Apache
> >> releases stating so?
> >>
> >> It feels like we should have some sort legalese in place.
> >>
> >> - Taylor
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;>
> >>
> >>
> >
>


-- 
Sent from my Mobile device

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message