I agree. Lowering our standards is not a solution.
There are three binding votes required for many good reasons.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 10, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Unlikely to get at least Roy’s approval because release
> votes are expected to be a decision of the full committee,
> not any one member of it.
>
> On Nov 10, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2013, at 1:04 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> How about simply changing the rules for Incubator releases so that
>>> they don't require at least three binding votes, but instead make it
>>> at least three votes only one of which must be binding. That would
>>> mean there would still be the element of oversight that a mentor vote
>>> gives but avoids all the problems with not having three mentors. I'm
>>> sure the board would grant the Incubator authority to implement that
>>> change.
>>
>> The board has charged us to vet the podlings and their releases. What process is
used is up to us.
>>
>> I would prefer a variant of your proposal. The first release needs three mentor/IPMC
votes. Subsequent releases only require one mentor/IPMC vote.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|