From general-return-41579-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Jun 19 06:02:14 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5DD910805 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55800 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2013 06:02:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55672 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2013 06:02:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55663 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2013 06:02:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:02:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ant.elder@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.51] (HELO mail-oa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.219.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:02:02 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id i4so6044351oah.24 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:01:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5lpq/Al20MNMVVivAeaCwTIIFMcI1fMvutjsb7w49TA=; b=zmUVc4vg3XzHvRW/H19GteJHZACko/js3uZhKzQVvC0yhyuMuwRMDKM+Q30U2Pvk8l 6wyvH5kcEuw2rfTyX1ZxlDQXMfiKBVNbGaWjaYc1YtnGDKBL3dUG7Tcro88pPYwUshcz y/W8q3xW+vsIsFqqaT2b+Z9fq5mAdafLn4O3skUlHoFVYkHm+TSjgzfBFzAr/A2nJEEV dT0c2qgtbJKBOEZJroZtbY3AHeJ6VqJqU/2iwnsKfC/BaDyD3AdeFRczuEbSmNtHdIqf wPMkUR2HbrV80+ctp4Mfhp+36F2sOsjHu89vql7k3ZRjbOmJjLmCp+E0TdFGix5OglHO ityQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.33.202 with SMTP id t10mr1009547oei.2.1371621702063; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.87.34 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:01:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1371596772.82849.YahooMailNeo@web124702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <20130618161207.GA87427@minotaur.apache.org> <1371596772.82849.YahooMailNeo@web124702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:01:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Stratos proposal: is it possible to add another initial committer? From: ant elder To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c66b451655104df7b90b1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013c66b451655104df7b90b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > He said majority, not everybody ant. Try a little harder to > understand the written words instead of needing to interject > your dissonant 2 cents and things will improve around here. > > Don't be so abrasive Joe, I'm a mentor for this podling so I'm at least as entitled as everyone else to express my view. If you must be pedantic he said majority of IPMC which we certainly haven't had in this thread, and a quick tally of comments in this thread so far actually shows most are saying its fine to do this (unless i've counted wrong?). ...ant --089e013c66b451655104df7b90b1--