incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <>
Subject Re: Stratos proposal: is it possible to add another initial committer?
Date Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:06:12 GMT
He said majority, not everybody ant. Try a little harder to
understand the written words instead of needing to interject
your dissonant 2 cents and things will improve around here.

Anyway the point is that when you see multiple changes to an
in-progress VOTE on a proposal, it suggests not that we
need to be more flexible, or let the champion dictate common
courtesy, but instead that the VOTE should restart once the
dust has settled as it was clearly premature.  If there's
some rush to modify the document instead of following approved
policy on adding new committers (which formally doesn't even
require a vote), just cancel+restart the vote once the proposal is
done being modified.  It's the most respectful thing to do.

----- Original Message -----
> From: ant elder <>
> To:
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Stratos proposal: is it possible to add another initial committer?
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Ross Gardler
> <>wrote:
>>  It seems clear that the majority of IPMC members believe this change
>>  on a vote in progress is not acceptable.
> Don't assume its that clear, i think at least some agree with you that this
> is just ISSUE3 and kept quiet, thats what i did.
> I think its fine, its nothing like changing a release artifact during a
> release, IMHO the way to judge it is if the champion for the proposal being
> voted on doesn't object to the addition, if the champion is ok then just
> carry on.
>    ...ant

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message