incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <>
Subject Re: Incubator voting status page
Date Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:12:48 GMT
On 29.01.2013 17:23, sebb wrote:
> On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko ─îibej <> wrote:
>> On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
>>>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
>>>> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
>>>> podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
>>>> need to get podling developers interested with.
>>> I have a current example.  Flex and Wink haven't updated their
>>> podlings.xml entries to
>>>     status="graduated"
>>> , therefore certain infra scripts still consider them podlings rather
>>> than PMCs.
>> Nor had PhotArk updated its entry to "retired" until I did that
>> yesterday to get rid of one of the warnings.
>> I'm not actually all that worried. The worst that can happen in the case
>> of the voter script is that some votes don't get recorded, or are
>> recorded later than expected. The script does emit warnings if it sees
>> strangeness; I /could/ teach it to send the warnings to the podling's
>> dev list (if known), cc: general@. But I'd rather not open the spam
>> floodgates unless people really want me to.
> Why not append the errors to the end of the report?

Good idea, I'll do that.

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message