incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating
Date Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:07:02 GMT
On 23 October 2012 16:43, sebb <> wrote:
> On 23 October 2012 13:57, Alexander Broekhuis <> wrote:
>> Hi incubator people,
>> I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
>> The last few months we have been working on this release.
>> Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
>> files into the correct place etc.
>> This release has already been approved by our mentors and second committer:
>> * Karl Pauls (pauls) (binding)
>> * Marcel Offermans (marrs) (binding)
>> * Pepijn Noltes (pnoltes)
>> See for their votes
>> As can be seen, we are currently one mentor short, I'll open another
>> thread for finding a new mentor. But, for now, this means we at least need
>> one
>> more binding vote. So if anyone has some free cycles, please take a
>> look at this release
>> The source release file and signatures can be found on:
> Where is the release tag that corresponds with the release?
> Where is the KEYS file?
> -1
> The key id (EB686AF9) is not available from the standard PGP servers.
> Also the sig and hashes do not agree with the archive, and the hashes
> have an unusual format.
> Furthermore, the archive does not unpack correctly with WinZip (I can
> extract the tar file, but WinZip cannot handle the tar file).
>> Before voting please review the section,
>> "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?", at
>> Known issues:
>> * The BUILDING file notes that the source can be found in the "celix"
>>   directory, this is actually "celix-0.0.1-incubating"
>> * The BUILDING file points to
>>   this content will be placed in the BUILDING file itself for a next
>> release.
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [X] -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments)
> See above; the dist artifacts are badly broken.

I've now tried checking out the SVN directory, and the sigs and hashes are OK.

There is something wrong when downloading using a browser.
I tried both Firefox and Chrome; they both result in the same (corrupted) file.
However Opera is OK.

This needs to be resolved before the files can be safely published.

Also, the key needs to be uploaded to a public key server.

I've not checked the contents of the archive, because I don't know the
tag to which it is supposed to correspond.

>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> --
>> With kind regards,
>> Alexander Broekhuis

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message