Thanks a lot for your effort Henri,
we will do as you suggested.
Do you thing we are missing anything else legally wise?
Regards
Antonio
On Aug 23, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Sounds like you should sign off on the first item in the Copyright
> section of http://incubator.apache.org/projects/amber.html as "n/a".
> No code was relicensed to the ASF when Amber was created. Instead it
> was a fork of Uni of Newcastle code and that copyright remains on the
> code.
>
> Hen
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Hi Henri,
>>
>> thanks for taking care of this.
>>
>> IANAL but technically yes I think that the OAuth 2.0 part of Amber can be considered
as a fork.
>>
>> Before to perform the first release we followed what has been suggested in LEGAL-134.
>> Did we miss something? Should we do something more or we can assume this legal issue
is over?
>>
>> Thanks and regards
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2012, at 8:28 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Antonio,
>>>
>>> This is about making sure that all software being contributed to
>>> Apache is covered by CLAs (continuous contribution) or the software
>>> license grant (single contribution). Legally it would also be fine to
>>> fork software under a Category A license, though it's frowned upon
>>> (ie: the status checkbox doesn't offer it as an option).
>>>
>>> By the look of LEGAL-134, it sounds like Amber started as a fork of
>>> University of Newcastle code?
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Henri,
>>>>
>>>> Amber wise we tracked this in [0].
>>>> Now I am not sure if we can also tick the box.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-134
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist
item:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009-02-09 kato
>>>>> 2009-02-13 stonehenge
>>>>> 2009-05-13 socialsite
>>>>> 2010-05-19 amber
>>>>> 2010-09-05 nuvem
>>>>> 2010-11-12 kitty
>>>>> 2010-11-24 stanbol
>>>>> 2011-06-13 openofficeorg
>>>>>
>>>>> Said checklist item is:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
>>>>> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>>>>> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>>>>>
>>>>> How long do we host software without explicitly stating we have these
rights?
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally I think 1 year is more than enough, even for OpenOffice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that this list comes from
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects
>>>>>
>>>>> Hen
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|