I find the proposal interesting too. I gave it a lot of though and I am
considering getting involved as well. I have a question however for the
proponents and supporters of the project.
What makes this project different than (almost) all the other ASF
projects is that it has a high(er) barrier to entry in terms of hardware
requirements. The reality is that such a project has little chances of
becoming a viable competitor in the industry without strong support from
companies like Citrix (and I salute their commitment). Will such
resources be made available to the whole community, how was this envisioned?
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 04/04/2012 04:22 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Alex Karasulu<akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Matt Hogstrom<matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>>
>>> The proposal looks good. I'm excited that the community is looking to
>>> grow at the ASF. I'm working on similar technology in my day job at IBM
>>> and am interested in getting involved. Happy to mentor if you need,
>>> although, it has quite a large list now as I look at the Wiki.
>>>
>>>
>> The number of mentors should not be an issue. As stated before, in other
>> threads, the number of mentors is unbounded and AOO has 8 as an example.
>>
>> The perspective podling should not feel that the list is too long - more
>> mentors and interest is a good thing. We have much to do, the project is
>> not small, and it would be nice to see the community gracefully pass thru
>> incubation as fast as posible in accordance with incubator standards. More
>> mentors might help in this regard.
>>
>
> Indeed
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> -- Alex
>>
>
>
>
--
Hadrian Zbarcea
Principal Software Architect
Talend, Inc
http://coders.talend.com/
http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|