incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leo Simons <>
Subject Re: February report review
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:36:02 GMT

I'd also suggest that the below is a partial answer to the board's
questions to the IPMC on how it would improve oversight so it should
probably go in our report.



On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting <> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam Ruby <> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jukka Zitting <> wrote:
>> What I would like to see is the Incubator start identifying PPMCs that
>> are stalled, and to consider what information they need (in future
>> reports) to help them (us) make such a determination.  I am not
>> suggesting that this be made retroactive.  Or that it be done
>> immediately.  A plan would be fine: i.e., setting a date by which the
>> IPMC will have decided what information needs to be in such reports,
>> and a schedule by which the PPMCs need to start providing said
>> information.
> My suggestion is to ask the podlings now in category 2 to report again
> in May on their progress on the identified blockers. If there's been
> no measurable progress by then, we'll dig deeper to see what we can
> do. Podlings reporting in other months can be picked up for a similar
> oversight cycle over the coming months. By July we should then have a
> pretty accurate record of progress throughout the entire Incubator,
> including a clear list of podlings that are stuck and need help.
> Before the next quarterly report I'd rely on mentors to help the
> podlings identify and implement ways to move forward. And of course,
> if a podling or its mentors feel that more help is needed, asking on
> general@ or submitting an extra report is always a good idea.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message