incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <>
Subject Re: February report review
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:14:17 GMT
----- Original Message -----

> From: Sam Ruby <>
> To:; Joe Schaefer <>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:08 PM
> Subject: Re: February report review
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer <> 
> wrote:
>>>  From: Sam Ruby <>
>>> I don't mean this to sound like a "yes, but", but you have 
> identified
>>> 12 podlings that aren't new and aren't ready to graduate.  Are 
> there
>>> active plans to address the top issue identified?    If there are
>>> plans, and there is evidence of recent progress towards resolving the
>>> issue, fine.  Otherwise, please identify what actions the Incubator
>>> PMC should be taking.  That action could be as simple as asking the
>>> podling to report again next month.
>>  Well that would require more careful scrutiny of the individual reports.
>>  SIS, one of the wayward podlings I am mentoring, is trying to kick things
>>  into gear again, but might be worthwhile subjecting to another report next
>>  month.
> The part of the sentence above after the final comma anticipated my
> next comment.
> It should not require careful scrutiny of the reports.  To the
> contrary, this information should be readily apparent in each
> podling's report.  If not, and the podling is not just getting
> started, ask for a report again which contains this information.

Well the info about SIS is there, it's just that there hasn't been
a sufficent work history behind SIS to leave it at that for another
3 months IMO.  If the new effort is going to be successful it needs to
be self-sustaining, on a weekly basis at a minimum.

> As long as this information is present, actually changes from quarter
> to quarter, and is signed off by mentor(s), and there is no reason to
> otherwise suspect that there is any unreported problem, the report
> should be approved.
>>> P.S.  This may very well piss off four people, but have you thought
>>> about being Chair for the Incubator PMC?
>>  LOL.  If Jukka is going to perform on this level consistently
> No /if/ about it.  Jukka *has* been performing on this level
> consistently month to month.

Which makes his protests about not having sufficient time for the
Chair role ring hollow to me.  He can do it, hell he IS doing it now ;-)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message