incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net>
Subject Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)
Date Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:55:15 GMT
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Stuart Monteith <stukato@stoo.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>        Does not having the report forwarded imply being pushed out of the incubator?
As far as I can tell, the point being made was that there was nothing going on in the project,
and so nothing should be reported - I'll leave Benson to clarify.

Contrary to how things work here in the Incubator, at least 6
Directors read each and every report that is forwarded to the Board
monthly.  Apparently Benson feels that it is unreasonable to expect at
least one Incubator PMC member to actually read the one report that
this PMC sends on.  Yes, I'm irritated.

A number of times a year the board rejects a report for one reason or
another.  In each case, we do not kick the project out, we simply ask
that a corrected report be submitted the next month.  In extreme
cases, we as a project to go back to a monthly reporting schedule.

> I'll back up what Ant said - Robert and Ant have shown heroic patience as mentors on
this project. The situation will resolve itself one way or the other soon.

If the question is whether Robert and Ant are good guys, there is no
question, they both have my vote on that question.

If the question is whether or not a podling can essentially copy and
paste the same report quarter after quarter, year after year, with
little or no change, then I strongly object.

If you believe that unlike previous quarters, there is some reason to
actually believe that things will be clearing up shortly, at a very
minimum, put THAT in the report.  Show that something is actually
happening, or something new is being attempted, or something
unexpected came up.  Anything other than repeating the same optimistic
and apparently unrealistic content over and over again.

> Regards,
>        Stuart

- Sam Ruby

P.S. I will state that we already have had a more meaningful
discussion on this topic than has been typical for the incubator.  I
encourage others to participate in this discussion.  Both people who
agree with me and people see things differently.  Anything would be
better than mindlessly forwarding on reports without actually reading
them.

> On 11 Jan 2012, at 23:05, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> And here we return to a thread of some weeks ago. One chair can't
>>>> review all those reports and push the bounce buttons. Some other
>>>> people have to step up to help.
>>>
>>> This Board member reads each and every one of them every month.  So it
>>> is no change in workload to me to push this work down.
>>>
>>> Instead of talking about this abstractly, -1 on forwarding to the
>>> board the following reports.  I'll start with the most egregious one:
>>>
>>> -1 on forwarding on the Kato report.  Here are prior reports from this
>>> podling: https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Kato.html
>>>
>>> Key excerpts:
>>>  Kato:
>>>    Jan 2012
>>>      * Decide in what form the podling should continue, if at all.
>>>    Sept 2011
>>>      * Decide in what form the podling should continue, if at all.
>>>    June 2011
>>>      * Decide in what form the podling should continue, if at all.
>>>    March 2011
>>>      * To be determined once Oracle's involvement has been established.
>>>    Dec 2010
>>>      * To be determined once Oracle's involvement has been established.
>>>    Sep 2010
>>>      * To be determined once Oracle's involvement has been established.
>>>    June 2010
>>>      * To be determined once Oracle's involvement has been established.
>>>
>>
>> I'm a mentor for Kato, and there is another mentor who is active, and
>> we talk to them regularly about deciding what to do. I think they're
>> close to deciding to retire the poddling and i think its likley thats
>> what they'll be saying come their next report. I think its good if
>> they can come to that decision by themselves rather than be pushed
>> out, is it really causing any trouble to have them sitting there not
>> doing very much in the meantime?
>>
>>   ...ant
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message