incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <>
Subject Re: Improviing quarterly reports
Date Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:19:46 GMT

On Jan 11, 2012, at 10:44 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:

> On 1/11/2012 11:54 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 00:33, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>> Now lets look at the remainder- several projects with no report whatsoever
>>> This has been an issue.  Perhaps we need to put some teeth in the
>>> requirement, such as closing down commit access until reports are posted?  I
>>> don't have an issue with saying that a project that does not report by the
>>> assigned cut-off date has its commit access turned off until the report is
>>> posted.  Or, perhaps to give weight to your view that Mentors need to be
>>> more involved, until after it is signed off by a Mentor?
>> Is sending (satisfactory) reports to the IPMC the responsibility of the
>> mentors or of the PPMC?
> The project.  Which means, the PPMC collectively, including its mentors.
> Optimally the mentors lead the first few times to an incoming community
> who isn't familiar with our reporting goals.  They can pick it up from
> there.  The goal of incubation is for the PPMC to (gradually) assume
> all of the tasks that a TLP is responsible for.

I would go a bit further. I think the mentors have the responsibility of saying "Hey, where
is the report for me to sign?".

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message