From general-return-31121-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Aug 22 12:38:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8E758194 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43889 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2011 12:38:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42914 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2011 12:38:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42895 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2011 12:38:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:38:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:38:16 +0000 Received: by vwe42 with SMTP id 42so4114528vwe.6 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 05:37:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W8qDVjl+5crZ11lHFTppARAKraqsJdgNpQa1T2wshAg=; b=QTk7us0A8EXFMkIk5ReqfPsXxp1jTMCD4+0msDMENgVEIVWDZXjhxRvV06o5QnC9PY x0D3qXoOlXr3wEx+k9rlvuIrWnmwUPXw4wnoRf9FbQpd/fjVhfYTYBbcfiRNWmGxtPyT 6rBr8d0RFd2o5z8jPbsjZ/GF0rdro6C0TaCck= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.155.75 with SMTP id r11mr700830vcw.127.1314016674917; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 05:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.176.1 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 05:37:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:37:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating From: sebb To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tags are supposed to be immutable. For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename) when the vote succeeds. Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag. Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on. [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.] On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Tag replaced. > > A. > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer wrote: >> > New candidate up at >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/. >> The >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging >> files >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, exclu= ded >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been >> built >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar. >> > >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks! >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source. >> >> > A. >> > >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer > >wrote: >> > >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The >> tarball >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS = X - >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get th= e >> files >> >> missing headers today as well. >> >> >> >> A. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following: >> >>> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user >> >>> list]( >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics) >> >>> or [developer list]( >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics). >> >>> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release. >> >>> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file? >> >>> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb wrote: >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer >> wrote: >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please >> find >> >>> RC1 >> >>> >> at >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1= /. >> >>> > >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER. >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded. >> >>> > >> >>> >> Website should update shortly. >> >>> > >> >>> > No sign yet. >> >>> > >> >>> >> A. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer < >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com >> >>> >wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore file= s - >> >>> I'll >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the >> ones >> >>> that >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> =A0A. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer < >> andrew.bayer@gmail.com >> >>> >wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are so= me >> >>> files >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because >> they're >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, e= tc >> - >> >>> these >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing >> >>> something. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything i= s >> >>> under >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in >> SVN, >> >>> same >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being >> >>> built/used, >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there >> are >> >>> any >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check = it >> >>> out. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> A. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, versi= on >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating. >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues: >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=3D1231754= 9&styleName=3DHtml&projectId=3D12311420 >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 = (3 >> >>> working >> >>> >>>>> days >> >>> >>>>> > from now) >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag). >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature: >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0= / >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers. >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added t= o >> SVN >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the >> bigtop >> >>> >>>>> website. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (n= ot >> a >> >>> >>>>> blocker). >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after >> "developed >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be >> left >> >>> >>>>> dangling. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the >> source >> >>> >>>>> release. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive = - I >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directori= es >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. =A0This makes it very difficult to >> check >> >>> the >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on: >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incu= bating >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the >> >>> release: >> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release aft= er >> a >> >>> >>>>> successful >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official. >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks! >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> > A. >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------= - >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.o= rg >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >> general-help@incubator.apache.org >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------= - >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org