incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sam Ruby <>
Subject Re: A possibly gratuitous meta- thread on the open office discussion
Date Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:55:48 GMT
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Benson Margulies <> wrote:
> Option 1: a champion of the proposal takes inventory and starts a
> number of meaningfully-labeled threads for the subjects of ongoing
> discussion, and we all try to resist the urge to respond further in
> the original set. For those existing threads that have a coherent
> subject line and content, they could just be endorsed.

Sounds like a good id.... hey wait a second!  That's me!

First problem is the typical herding cats problem.

But more specific to this proposal, I will submit that this proposal
doesn't really need a champion, what it needs is mentors.  And the way
I like to mentor is by convincing people that yes, really, you are
allowed to directly make edits (in this case we are talking about the
proposal)  or to spin off new threads.

> Option 2: we use the wiki to stack up comments and concerns about the
> proposal. That does make it easier for anyone to show up and survey
> the territory.

Sounds like a great idea!  You do realize that it is a wiki, right?
Perhaps you could create a new page, sketch out what you would like to
see, leave some prominent TODOs for others, and advertise it here in a
new thread?  What do you think?

<ducks/>  :-)

> Option 3: you all ignore me, as is your privilege.
> If this were an in-person meeting, and I were the moderator (and pigs
> had wings ...) I'd be trying to sort out the areas of material
> disagreement and concern and focus attention onto them and away from
> everything else.

- Sam Ruby

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message