On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:58 PM, <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Of course, this is not necessarily a problem for Apache. Think of it this
> way. It would be perfectly possible, and actually quite easy for someone
> to host the files with a scalable cloud storage provider, e.g., Amazon,
> and charge $0.99 for the download, the cost of an iPhone app. That is
> over $30 million/year. Heck, I might just do that myself and retire!
>
For clarity, are you proposing that Apache should charge $1/download for
OpenOffice.org, or are you proposing Apache should delegate downloads to an
external organisation that does this?
S.
|