incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tommaso Teofili <>
Subject Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?
Date Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:03:23 GMT
2010/11/8 Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <>

> I described this parts of Clerezza because they seem to be quite close to
> what you suggest for commons. As it is hard to share utilities without
> having shared APIs for the core stuff our code deals with I think some
> efforts in this area could have the greatest benefit.


Also in Clerezza there are some ontologies [1] defined which would be good
to share in a "semantic repository" for ontologies. I think especially
Clerezza and Stanbol would benefit from such a common repo. This, in my
opinion, would fit well into semantic commons.


[1] :

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message