incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andy Seaborne <>
Subject Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?
Date Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:19:05 GMT

On 08/11/10 17:30, Ian Dickinson wrote:
> Hi Donald,
> On 08/11/10 17:01, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> Perhaps would be a better example?  Should there be a
> I looked around in and I couldn't see anything that said
> what the goals of that project are, separate from the goals of the
> individual sub-projects. Where should I be looking?
> As others have noted, the three semantic web-related projects currently
> being proposed have rather different objectives and provide different
> capabilities. I personally don't object in principle to factoring out
> common code or needs where that's useful, but +1 to Olivier: let's wait
> until a clear requirement is identified.

I agree.  I don't think that a "semantic" XYZ is useful if that makes 
"semantic" some sort of different software.  Semantic web technology is 
getting used more widely and a semantic commons or formal grouping of 
projects risks creating the idea that it's all or nothing, which isn't 
the case, hopefully.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message