incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Yang <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator
Date Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:14:18 GMT
+1 for 1.


On 6/24/10 12:21 PM, "William A. Rowe Jr." <> wrote:

> On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder <> wrote:
>>> IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa
>>> website/svn/MLs because I think Chukwa should just go directly to a
>>> TLP and if they have to use the incubator naming it may help them
>>> decide that the direct to TLP route really is better ;-)
>> I see you blinking here, so I guess this is not just for putting up a
>> strawman ;-)
> Well folks, it's a fun debate and all, but it isn't helping bring this
> vote to a conclusion :)
> Is anyone in agreement with ant?  Otherwise we should just move ahead
> and can hold a separate vote on allowing tlp resource creation at this
> time.
> If the proposers want (Eric?) a three choice vote, 1. recommend TLP with
> guides to help the initial pmc, 2. accept incubating with tlp resource
> naming, but -incubating release naming, or 3. accept incubating requiring
> all incubator naming conventions, that might help the incubator simplify
> this decision.
> At this point, I personally guess that 1. might be the most sensible in
> terms of resource creation and management; it would simply require the
> group to vote for an initial chair/VP.  If they are unsure of their group
> yet, perhaps one of the other mentors would offer to serve as their chair
> for the first six months, if they rather would do that?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message