incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Florent Guillaume>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement Interoperability Services (CMIS)
Date Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:35:18 GMT
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Michael Wechner
<> wrote:
> Right and as long as OpenCMIS fulfills the requirements of the incubator I
> don't see any reason why there shouldn't be two projects of the same topic.
> I also do not see any reason why OpenCMIS should be a sub-project of
> Chemistry.
> Give it a chance of its own within the current rules of the incubator and it
> will either work or not.
> If it works, then graduate, if not, then remove it.

My concern is that if there are two separate svn trees then factoring
things between the two projects will be much harder. Let's not kid
ourselves, having two different maven release cycles, and having
dependencies to foreign SNAPSHOT projects, will not help. To me it's a
waste of time and effort.

Let me ask the question differently: what's lost by having the code in
the Chemistry svn tree?


Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)   +33 1 40 33 79 87

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message