incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bertrand Delacretaz <>
Subject Re: Does an incubation proposal require a codebase?
Date Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:52:21 GMT
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Niall
Pemberton<> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bertrand
> Delacretaz<> wrote:
>> ...I would oppose to a podling with no code base and no names
>> in the list of initial committers - the chances of morphing that into
>> a working Apache project would seem to slim to me.
> I don't understand this, any proposal is going to need some mentors to
> get accepted, so if there members of the IPMC are willing to oversee
> this, why would you want to add an additional requirement of existing
> committers? I thought the idea to incubator was "low entry barrier,
> high exit barrier"....

I was imagining a bunch of unknown people coming up with a vague idea
for a project, and no that would seem too risky to warrant
dedicating resources to a podling.

Now, if mentors were enthusiastic about that podling, why not...that's
kind of a rethorical question anyway, as in the present case Noah
indicates that there is a group of experienced people.

Let's see their proposal then, but from what I've seen in this thread
I'm positive about it.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message