incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [VOTE] 72-hour lazy consensus for podling committer + PPMC member votes (was: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes...)
Date Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:23:47 GMT
Would it be worthwhile to capture this discussion in a patch to the  
offending paragraph?


On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:

> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> I have one small problem, and was otherwise +1 on the final  
>> proposed text;
>>> This approach is considered inferior by many because it is a  
>>> source of
>>> discord to have a public vote like this fail or take a very long  
>>> time.
>> The reason public votes are inferior is that some of the IPMC  
>> members may
>> be reluctant to share their private issues or opinions of a  
>> prospective
>> committer on a public forum, period.
>> There is no other reason for not voting in public.
> Personally, I generally consider it a bad idea to have discussions  
> of people in a public forum, a view that I consider reinforced as  
> more employers turn to scanning the Internet looking for information  
> on staff or potential staff.
> 	--- Noel
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
408 276-5638
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message