incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [VOTE] 72-hour lazy consensus for podling committer + PPMC member votes (was: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes...)
Date Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:11:49 GMT
I've updated with  
the changes proposed by Justin, Noel, and Bill. Please take a look.


On Jun 23, 2008, at 12:56 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> Umm... why "no binding -1 votes"?   I thought adding a committer  
>> wasn't a vetoable thing, just code modifications.   This should be  
>> a majority approval vote thing. (with it linked to

>>  for details)
> A -1 should be triggering a proper review of the objection.  If it's  
> legit,
> several +1's will become -1's, but understanding why that vote was  
> cast
> (maybe obstructionism, maybe personal bias, maybe an unhealthy  
> community)
> will help the incubator understand if the project is on track to  
> graduate
> and manage itself.
> So the "no binding -1's" just triggers a proper review and vote, no  
> longer
> just lazy consensus.  It doesn't happen often and needs to be  
> reviewed.
> Bill
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
408 276-5638
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message