On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:55 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
> <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> > Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >
> > > I've wasted too much time today on the stupid IP Clearance template
> > > that insists on asking a bunch of irrelevant questions about
> > > decisions that the Incubator is not responsible for making.
> > > The required IP clearance questions should be:
> > >
> > > Date:
> > > Identify the Contribution:
> > > Identify the Contributor(s):
> > > What are the filenames for the applicable
> > > software grant(s):
> > > Corporate CLA(s):
> > > Individual CLA(s):
> > > Location of initial import:
> > > Destination PMC:
> > >
> > > That's it.
> > >
> >
> > One more;
> >
> > Determine www.a.o/licenses/exports implications
> > for notifications.
> >
> > That's my last crypto audit step, putting that request to all incubator
> > podlings and ensuring this mess is under control moving forwards. Without
> > adding this as an IP import step, it won't happen.
>
> i've committed a stripped down template and moved the prose into a
> guide. this guide is just copy ATM but i'll try to find some time to
> tidy it up sometime tomorrow.
>
> feedback on the template appreciated or just jump in with a patch ;-)
after process objections, i've reverted the source and withdraw this
patch. if anyone wants to pick it up, i've opened a JIRA.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|