On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:59 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/04/2008, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
<snip>
> > > I misspoke. Here's what I meant to ask:
> > >
> > > Do we need to 1) include all the licenses for all our dependencies in a
> > single LICENSE file or can we 2) have our top LICENSE file which is ASL and
> > then have individual LICENSE files for each library in the lib/ directory.
> > >
> >
> > I'm not aware of a requirement for having only 1 LICENSE file. In fact, the
> > document says you don't have to append 3rd-party licenses to the LICENSE
> > file. It does say you should put a pointer to the license files. So, IMO, 2)
> > is fine. Other Apache projects do this also.
>
> 2) is fine so long as the main LICENSE jar tells users where to find
> the other license - i.e. it has pointers to the other licenses.
AIUI this is not policy
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|