incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
Date Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:01:23 GMT
On 11/03/2008, Bob Buffone <rbuffone@nexaweb.com> wrote:
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]
>  Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:23 AM
>  To: general@incubator.apache.org
>  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
>
>  On 10/03/2008, Bob Buffone <rbuffone@nexaweb.com> wrote:
>  > Incubator PM,
>  >
>  >  The XAP team has put together a new release of the project (0.5.0)
>  and
>  >  it has been approved by the xap-dev list with 8 (+1s) and 0 (others).
>  We
>  >
>  >It would be helpful to have a link to the vote thread.
>
>
> http://www.g8l.us/49f
>
>
>  >
>  >
>  >  are now asking the Incubator PM to approve this release so we can
>  >  distribute it.
>  >
>  >  The release candidate has been posted at:
>  >  http://people.apache.org/~bbuffone/xap-release/0.5.0-incubator/
>  >
>  >
>  >Which SVN tag was used for the release?
>  >
>
>
> XAP_0.5.0
>

This seems to contain lots of files that are not in the archive:

unittests/
JSDoc-1.9.9.2/

Also, some of the files in the archive are different from the tagged files, e.g.

build-manufacturing.xml has two different versions.

build.bat does not seem to be the same file at all

buildUtil$py.class

There seem to be a lot of class files in SVN - this is not usual.

>  >
>  >Where is the KEYS file containing the signer's public key?
>  >
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/xap/KEYS
>
>
>  >
>  >Is there a RAT report?
>  >
>
>
> There is one, I have put it at
>  http://people.apache.org/~bbuffone/xap-release/0.5.0-incubator/rat_outpu
>  t.txt
>
>
>  >
>  >Normally there are separate source and binary archives.
>  >
>
>
> Being that this is an Ajax toolkit, we have included all the source
>  files in the distribution to allow people to be able to customize the
>  application loading profile of their application.  Users can either load
>  one large file upfront and make zero JavaScript requests later, or a
>  smaller upfront file and more JavaScript requests later.
>

But does the archive need to contain the build files as well?


There seem to be several copies of some files, e.g.

dojo.js.uncompressed.js
custom_rhino.jar
flash6_gateway.fla

Is it necessary to include both xapcore.js and xapcore.js.gz?
Similarly for the other .js/.js.gz file pairs.

Should the two "Thumbs.db" files be included? They look like Windows
system files.

>  >  Please cast your votes:
>  >
>  >  [ ] +1 Release is approved
>  >  [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>  >
>  >  Thank you,
>  >  Bob (Buffone)
>  >
>  >
>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>  >
>  >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message