incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "robert burrell donkin" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1
Date Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:58:10 GMT
On 11/17/06, Guillaume Nodet <> wrote:
> The ServiceMix community voted on and has approved to release ServiceMix
> 3.0.1-incubating.
> We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
> publish the release.

+0 ATM

the first jar i check seemed to be missing from LICENSE. (need to
finish the RAT code that checks jar licenses. might take me a day or
two.) it must be tough getting the LICENSE.txt right for so many jars

a few missing headers needing clarification

-- questions --

RAT: following have no license headers:

is there a reason for this or is this just an oversight?

-- issues --

activation-1.1.jar is CDDL'd but isn't included in LICENSE.txt (may be
more but i'd need to finish writing RAT jar checking code)

-- comments  (not requirements) --

--- notes and suggestions  (not requirements) ---

there are a lot of poms with missing license headers in the source
release. this is a maven bug this results in these
files being stripped of license information before the tag is cut.

both source and binary distributions unpack to the same directory. i
personally prefer each distribution type to unpack to a different
directory but the overlay style is ok provided that care is taken in
the arrangement of the contents.

i strongly recommend adding RELEASE_NOTES. these are an important form
of guerrilla advertising. yes, tools like maven can generate lots of
documentation about the release but this doesn't replace a
RELEASE_NOTES explaining the project, inviting people to get involved
and inducating where other information can be found.

- robert

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message