incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Diephouse <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1
Date Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:45:36 GMT
Since these are generated files, must they have license headers? We had 
a recent discussion on this on the legal-discuss list. To quote Roy: [1]

>We don't require headers on generated files because they are a pain
>in the butt to generate.  Headers are not required to preserve  
>so there is no "legal" reason to provide them at all.  The reason we do
>provide them is to inform the users that we have given them permission
>to do Apache Licensed things with the code that copyright would  
>prevent them from doing.  In other words, the header is just us being
>nice to our users (and hopefully reducing future FAQs).
- Dan

Guillaume Nodet wrote:

>They were in svn before the release has been performed by
>the maven plugin.    They still are present in the branch that
>was used to release this version.  Unfortunately, it seems
>to be a maven bug :(
>Guillaume Nodet
>robert burrell donkin wrote:
>>On 11/17/06, Guillaume Nodet <> wrote:
>>>The ServiceMix community voted on and has approved to release ServiceMix
>>>We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
>>>publish the release.
>>running RAT, there seem to be a *lot* of poms without license header.
>>any reason why they are missing?
>>- robert
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>For additional commands, e-mail:

Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message