Hi,

On 8/15/06, Bob Scheifler <Bob.Scheifler@sun.com> wrote:
> But I'm not sure it matters at this point whether we agree on how
> to interpret success or failure in the past.

Agreed. I'm sorry for bringing the issue out in that light.

> I'm not convinced the goal in the past was to have multiple
> implementations, vs allowing multiple implementations.

I think the interpretation of this goal underlies both the naming and
standard issues. In essence, does the Jini community see the project
being proposed as *the* Jini implementation or as *a* Jini
implementation?

BR,

Jukka Zitting

-- 
Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - info@yukatan.fi
Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org