incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carl Trieloff <>
Subject Re: Too many licenses? Was: [vote] Accept Glasgow
Date Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:48:32 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Carl Trieloff wrote:
>>> I think this is one of the options we can look at to have any member of
>>> the project provide feedback to the spec working group - however it seems
>>> presumptuous to use the ASL or work out details like this before we are
>>> accepted in incubator.
>> Well the ASL is the binding license of ASF work, so if that's a presumpesuesume tuous
>> assertion, perhaps this project belongs elsewhere?
The code is already under ASL, no issues with that. comment was to spec 
feedback, sorry if that
was not clear.

> Oh - to the first half of your statement, I don't think it's a bad idea to
> filter the suggestions through a few key mentors who can track proposals
> through the spec committee.  The bottom line is that the fruits of these
> ideas come from an ASL licensed code base by 'some member' who contributed
> to the implementation.  So ... it's very important to know that dev@ spec
> discussion will be usable by the spec committee when pushed that direction
> by the spec liasons, from the ASF or any participating company.
> That's not necessarily something to postpone until incubation; from the day
> the dev@ list is created, you will begin to collect ideas on the dev@ list.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message