incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ and ServiceMix reports
Date Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:56:33 GMT
Hi Henri,

I think a good example of why not just a shoe in is because when the
ServiceMix and ActiveMQ apache commiter list was created, it included
all previous commiters to the project.  But 100% of committers may not
have been active during the period of the incubation.  All though the
projects trusted those individuals enough in the past to give them
commit privileges, perhaps the TLP PMC may want to see more recent
activity to evaluate if they truly 'get' the Apache way.


On 3/15/06, Henri Yandell <> wrote:
> On 3/15/06, Hiram Chirino <> wrote:
> > Hi Noel,
> >
> > If the ActiveMQ / ServiceMix community do decide to go under some
> > other TLP,  I'm sure it would not take long for the active
> > participants of the community to asked to Join the TLP's PMC.  It
> > would behoove that PMC to include such active community participants
> > in the decision making proccess.
> Interesting reply - I'd been assuming that when an incubatee graduates
> into an existing project, it's PPMC automatically get added to the
> PMC. So I was a bit confused as to why Noel was even asking the
> question.
> > Furthermore, I believe that merging ActiveMQ and Servicemix into
> > Geronimo community and PMC is easier than most cases since there are
> > all ready several active ActiveMQ/ServiceMix commiters thar are
> > Geronimo PMC members.  Those PMC memebers can help propose and vouch
> > for additional commiters to join the PMC.
> Yeah, overlap would help. Still surprised that it's not just a shoe-in.
> Hen
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message