incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: Preventing exclusionary practices in Incubating projects
Date Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:33:21 GMT
James Strachan wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas <> wrote:
>> Alan/James dredged up a thought process which i want to ask all of you
>> about.
>> For a concrete example, I know for a fact that WADI, ActiveIO and
>> Trifork guys have been talking about coming up with a single framework
>> for IO. James hinted in a prev message and there have been some
>> references in emails on dev@geronimo list[1] and no traffic on
>> activemq list (as far as i can tell)
> Thats kinda the point - as up to now most of this code has not been part of
> Geronimo and so wouldn't have been discussed on the Geronimo lists. Once all
> the code has made it to the incubator, then we can start discussing this on
> the Geronimo list but right now there have not been any discussions  and
> AFAIK is no action plan - these things have so far only come to light when
> meeting in person at ApacheCon & other conferences and realising that
> there's lots of things we could do to consodiate code within the Geronimo
> family of projects - once they are all at Geronimo. The incuabtion of
> OpenEJB and WADI is progressing and we'll be able to tackle this soon - but
> rest assured it will happen on the Geronimo lists.

Yeah, I tried to facilitate discussions between the various ASF java 
projects.  There were some interesting ad hoc discussions w/ Geronimo, 
Trifork, WADI, ActiveIO, and Directory people.  No plans were made, just 
a lot of ideas exchanged and an agreement to work together.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message