incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <>
Subject Re: Non-final materials in final ASF materials (was: Re: ActiveMQ and ServiceMix reports)
Date Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:44:31 GMT
On Sunday 19 March 2006 20:46, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:41:04AM +0000, James Strachan wrote:
> > (i)  don't use the incubator code, but fork it elsewhere (say to
> > codehaus) and make releases there if Geronimo needs bug fixes
> > (ii) Geronimo use incubator release candidate releases
> > (iii) ActiveMQ performs actual releases that Geronimo can depend on
> > and use but put sufficient warnings in the jars that these are still
> > in the incubator

> Once again, my preference doesn't really matter. Its just an opinion, and
> the geronimo project needs to make the decisions. That said...
> I think we have an imperfect situation now that starts with "incubation
> release" being confusing, and this trickles through into an imperfect
> situation for geronimo when having to pick between these.

Nah... do iv) Stick the whole of Geronimo back into Incubation. Problem 
solved ;o)  ... just kidding.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message