incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] approve a milestone release of ActiveMQ?
Date Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:02:17 GMT
On 2/2/2006 8:57 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> On Feb 2, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>>> How should the disclaimer be associated?
>>> Well, this is a bit of an issue.  Why are the plain jars  
>>> available?  To
>>> allow automated downloads by Maven?  I have an issue with that,  
>>> since it
>>> could allow people to use the code without knowing that it is in the
>>> Incubator, but more to the point, we've had that discussion, and I  
>>> don't
>>> recall the resolution.
>> Even though it's not extremely descriptive, the maven group id that  
>> activemq is using is incubator-activemq.  So most folks who add the  
>> activemq dependency will realize that it's a dependency that's  
>> coming from the incubator.  I believe that this is the same thing  
>> that geronimo and derby did while they were in the incubator.
> This is exactly what Geronimo and Derby did.  There are several  
> projects that rely on ActiveMQ and most of these use Maven.  It would  
> be very painful to these projects to not have the jars available.
> One other point, any current user of ActiveMQ will have to modify  
> their Maven project descriptor to change the groupId of activemq to  
> incubator-activemq, which should be an clear sign that project is  
> incubating. 

This reflects my sentiments as well.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message