incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Roy T. Fielding" <>
Subject Re: [Fwd: Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate TMCg2]
Date Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:15:25 GMT
On Jan 7, 2006, at 8:15 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Final Results of incubation vote;
> Votes +1; wrowe, mads, jerenkrantz, jimjag, geirm
> Votes -1; [none]
> As such the project is accepted for incubation.


The proposal was never added to the wiki.  AFAICT, the proposal consists
of two committers and the product is named after their company.
The SourceForge site consists of nothing but a whitepaper without any
meaningful content -- just a set of goals and a list of results.

The proposal was voted +1 by four of the most over-committed members of
the ASF.  The mentors are already mentoring other podlings.  Mads  
to mentor as well, which seems to have been lost in the process.

How did you guys come to the conclusion that this belongs at Apache?
Are you prepared for the commitment required to incubate a group
that has zero Apache experience?  Is this going to be another stdcxx,
where the mentors failed to handle the basic incubation tasks?

I don't see it.  If you think this is under incubation, then you need
to start by creating a status page that reflects the actual resources
being requested and by whom.  After that, I suggest you find out the
actual list of committers.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message