incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Erenkrantz <>
Subject Re: Request for Comment : Harmony Contribution Policy
Date Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:22:22 GMT
--On August 1, 2005 12:06:27 AM -0400 "Geir Magnusson Jr." 
<> wrote:

> Comments?  (Like I need to ask for them... )

I think Part II should be removed or rather be the opposite: which 
components are you forbidden to participate in due to the answers in the 
questionnaire.  I don't like seeing the community get pigeon-holed like 
that: commit access should be 'blanket' unless there's a legal reason not 
to do so.

Part IV should contain mention of the software grant to the ASF.  We should 
have these on file for all large donations not developed under the 
'confines' of the ASF.

Part VIII should probably mention "employed by a corporation". 
(Self-employed people wouldn't necessarily need to sign a CCLA.)

Furthermore, my understanding of copyright law is that you can't be tainted 
by 'reading' source code years ago and then writing a version 
independently.  (In fact, the examples I've heard of are 'minutes apart' is 
legally acceptable.)  Of course, patent infringement occurs whether you've 
read the code or not.  FWIW, our compiler languages class here at UC Irvine 
teaches Java internals - therefore, they'd all be 'tainted' under this 
definition - which isn't actually the case.

The relevant questions should be whether you are currently covered by an 
NDA or other confidential agreements with Sun (err, BigCo).  -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message