Noel,

To keep this discussion honest and open, I would appreciate if we could 
dissociate it from the particular case of Logging Services. I am happy to 
discuss whatever questions or comments you might have on LS on a separate 
thread. Is that OK with you?

At 04:38 PM 3/14/2005, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> > I don't think the LS PMC could take over log4x code if the
> > current contributors stopped working on it.
>
>  (a) In what what is the Logging PMC managing the project?
>      What makes log4__ part of Logging other than a common-ish API?
>  (b) What about community development?
>
>As a general rule, developing community is essential to the long-term
>viability of a project.  And in the case of Loggging, it sounds as if you've
>really got an ontological collection of otherwise unrelated projects, which
>at the least means that each needs community development.
>
>Dw addressed the rest of your issues, and I'm in agreement with him, so I'll
>leave his words to stand.
>
> > What do people involved with several different projects have to say
> > on the matter?
>
>Whatever they wish to say.  One thing that I like about the Incubator is
>that it provides a focal point for discussing ASF practices.
>
>         --- Noel

-- 
Ceki Gülcü

   The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org