incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Garrett Rooney <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c
Date Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:41:59 GMT
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only to
>> do the required IP checklist.
> Right.
> By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project?  The 
> Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and register the 
> IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
> I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal to 
> create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"

The proposal was to create Lucene4c as a a subproject of the Lucene TLP. 
  We weren't clear what the best way to proceed was, so Erik had me make 
a proposal here.  If instead we can just go through the Lucene PMC 
that's fine with me, but I was under the impression that new subprojects 
are supposed to go through the incubator.  I know that's what happened 
with the HTTPD-CLI project, for example.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message