incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c
Date Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:46:32 GMT

On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:

> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if 
>>> only to
>>> do the required IP checklist.
>> Right.
>> By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project?  
>> The Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and 
>> register the IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
>> I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal 
>> to create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"
> The proposal was to create Lucene4c as a a subproject of the Lucene 
> TLP.  We weren't clear what the best way to proceed was, so Erik had 
> me make a proposal here.  If instead we can just go through the Lucene 
> PMC that's fine with me, but I was under the impression that new 
> subprojects are supposed to go through the incubator.  I know that's 
> what happened with the HTTPD-CLI project, for example.

It should also happen with Lucene4c as well.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message