incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: [RT] Incubator Reorg
Date Wed, 03 Dec 2003 08:40:08 GMT

Sam Ruby wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>> Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> For that reason, I believe that there needs to be a clear distinction 
>>> between PPMC members who are primarily observers and vetoers of last 
>>> resort, and those who are active in the construction of the project.
>> Is it really needed? I guess that those that are not so involved will 
>> automatically partecipate less be just observers, without us having to 
>> formalize such a figure.
> That would have been my guess too until the last few days.

I've put it this way on the wiki proposal, it should suffice:

"Incubator PMC members not engaged in active discussion and development 
on a project are on the project PPMC in quality of observers. They 
should refrain from voting on PPMC decisions unless really necessary, 
thus acting as vetoers of last resort.".

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message