incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason van Zyl <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] New Incubator rules and scope definition (long)
Date Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:15:42 GMT
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 03:45, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 03:23, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> ...
> >>In any case, if the vote is positive, we can start using the new rules 
> >>and continue discussing your proposal as a next step.
> > 
> > No, I would ask that you don't continue as my vote will not be positive
> > and at the very least I would like to spend a couple days finishing my
> > response.
> It's not that I don't want your proposal on this, it's the very 
> opposite. I'm just concerned that if we keep on dragging this, projects 
> like Axion that are coming in now (of which you are part AFAIK) will 
> remain in a limbo or use old procedures that we already don't want to 
> see applied anymore. 

Well that's just too bad. Things have dragged on around here forever
anyway. Another week isn't going to do any harm.

> IMHO there is no reason why we can't vote on this 
> and then vote on something better after a couple of weeks. In any case, 
> send it in, I'm really interested to see it.


Jason van Zyl

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message