incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason van Zyl <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] New Incubator rules and scope definition (long)
Date Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:41:55 GMT
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 03:23, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 12:20, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > 
> >>The "Incubator Reorg" threads have brought the Incubator to the 
> >>definition of a new set of rules, that aim to simplify, streamline and 
> >>generally make the process of incubation more effective.
> >>
> >>It's time to wrap it up. Hence I ask to vote on the acceptance of this 
> >>scope definition, which is the start of our charter, and on the proposed 
> >>line of action, specifically on the project spinoffs and on the creation 
> >>of PPMCs.
> >>
> >>My Vote: +1
> > 
> > What's the time frame for the vote? My response to the proposal is
> > lengthy so would a span of a week from now be reasonable?
> There has been a RT, then a PROPOSAL, and after much more than one week, 
> a vote. It's a bit late to reply, isn't it?

I would expect that it isn't given the impact the proposal could have it

> In any case, you are free to post anything at any time, but this vote 
> will of course go on (and yes, it will last more than a couple of days, 
> being so important).
> In any case, if the vote is positive, we can start using the new rules 
> and continue discussing your proposal as a next step.

No, I would ask that you don't continue as my vote will not be positive
and at the very least I would like to spend a couple days finishing my
response. I have no idea what the voting procedures are or what my vote
actually counts for it at all but it's tentatively -1.


Jason van Zyl

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message