incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: veto stuff
Date Sat, 09 Nov 2002 15:51:39 GMT
At 12:52 PM +0100 11/9/02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>I used wrong words.
>I meant to say that "the other side has equally compelling arguments that seem to demonstrate
that the justification is not valid.
>- A commits.
>- B vetos and says why, and the justification is rational.
>- A says that the justification of B doesn't stand, and it's rational too.
>- The community is split between the two opinions.

In the above case, the veto cannot be rational and non-rational at
the same time, at least I don't see how without a real-world example.
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [|]
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

View raw message