groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Gilligan <s...@msgilligan.com>
Subject Re: GroovyFX.next
Date Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:10:17 GMT
I'm interested in giving a GroovyFX a fresh look. (I'm especially
interested in the possibility of using annotations to generate
JavaFX property methods on POJOs)

JavaFX 11 and later is fine (preferred, in fact.)  I also think it would
be preferable to target this to Groovy 4.

-- Sean

On 12/10/20 1:04 PM, Andres Almiray wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A question for those of you still using GroovyFX or willing to give it
> a try:
>
> As you may be aware JavaFX8 and JavaFX9 are binary incompatible due to
> package updates. It's a bit troublesome for library makers to keep a
> project compatible with JavaFX8 and JavaFX9+ (as a matter of fact I'd
> Say skip JavaFX9 & 10, use 11 as the base instead as it's LTS).
>
> The question is:
> - Do you need JavaFX 8 compatibility? In other words, can you move to
> JavaFX11 as a minimum?
>
> Cheers,
> Andres
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
> http://andresalmiray.com <http://andresalmiray.com>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray <http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray>
> --
> What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
> There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
> binary, and those who don't.
> To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.



Mime
View raw message