groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Sadedin <ssade...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy 2.6 potential retirement to focus on Groovy 3.0
Date Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:47:19 GMT
As with everyone else: option 3, or even just solving the Java9+ issue
separate from 3.0 is much more important than JDK7.

Cheers,

Simon

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Iván López <lopez.ivan@gmail.com> wrote:

> I also vote for Option 3. I think it is better to focus on JDK 9+ than in
> JDK 7.
>
> Regards, Iván.
>
> --
> @ilopmar <http://www.twitter.com/ilopmar>
>
> On 13 June 2018 at 11:30, Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 08:11 +0100, David Dawson wrote:
>> > I would vote 2.
>> >
>> > Actually, i would vote 3) abandon 2.6 immediately.
>> >
>>
>> I vote for Option 3, abandon 2.6 immediately.
>>
>> With so little resource, the Groovy project must focus on forward looking
>> work, not backward looking stuff. JDK10 is whee the current action is, and
>> where Groovy should be looking to be competitive.
>>
>> --
>> Russel.
>> ===========================================
>> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
>> 41 Buckmaster Road
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=41+Buckmaster+Road&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> m: +44 7770 465 077
>> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message