groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Trasuk <>
Subject Re: Correct way of referring to Groovy
Date Wed, 04 Nov 2015 13:38:36 GMT

> On Nov 4, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Schalk Cronjé <> wrote:
> A post of the other day made me think about this (Russel's to blame as usual). What is
the correct to referring to Groovy in documentation now?
>   Is it Groovy or is it Apache Groovy?
> OR
>   Is it Groovy for releases prior to 2.4 and Apache Groovy for 2.4 and beyond?
> -- 
> Schalk W. Cronjé
> Twitter / Ello / Toeter : @ysb33r

Branding policy:  

This is in place, of course, to make sure that the PMC remains in control of the product,
and nobody can become confused by somebody else calling their version “ZeCo Groovy” or

Documentation, I think should pretty much follow the “Website” guidelines, so in brief,
there should be a prominent mention of “Apache Groovy”, but referring to it as just “Groovy”
in other places in the page is fine.


Greg Trasuk.
View raw message