groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Quackenbush <quackfu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is it possible to implement in the language an `else` block in exception handling?
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:48:41 GMT
Finally *always* runs. Else runs *only if* there are no exceptions.
On Oct 1, 2015 12:08 AM, "Jochen Theodorou" <blackdrag@gmx.org> wrote:

> Am 28.09.2015 19:44, schrieb Edinson E. Padrón Urdaneta:
>
>> ​>What behaviour do you expect of the else block if an exception exception
>>
>>> in the try block is thrown, which is not catched and if a finally block
>>> is present? Example:
>>>
>>> try {
>>>>   m1() //throws MyException
>>>> } catch (SomeExceptionThatWillNotBeThrown e) {
>>>> } else {
>>>>   m2()
>>>> } finally {
>>>>   m3()
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>
>>> So is this supposed to do m1();m3() then? In  other words apiece of code
>>> executed only if he try block throws no exception at all?
>>>
>> ​
>> ​Hi, Jochen. That's right, /m2()/ would not be executed because the
>> exception threw wasn't catch and the normal java/groovy behavior of
>> executing /m3()/ and passing the exception threw inside the try block to
>> the 'next higger context' would happen.
>>
>
>
> sorry, didn't see the answer for some reason... how does it differ from
>
> try {
>   m1() // throws MyException
>   m2()
> } catch (SomeExceptionThatWillNotBeThrown e) {
> } finally {
>   m3()
> }
>
> bye blackdrag
>
> --
> Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
> blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
>
>

Mime
View raw message