I'm not sure it can be done exactly as you described, but one can get
creative with bitwise operator overloading which might get close
enough:
class LogicallyChallenged {
static Closure and(Closure left, Closure right) {
{ a, b > left(a, b) && right(a, b) }
}
static Closure or(Closure left, Closure right) {
{ a, b > left(a, b)  right(a, b) }
}
}
def gt = { a, b > a > b },
eq = { a, b > a == b },
lt = { a, b > a < b }
def equal = use (LogicallyChallenged) {
(gt  eq) & (lt  eq)
}
assert equal(1, 1)
assert equal('a', 'a')
assert !equal(1, 2)
assert !equal('a', 'b')
Cheers,
Dinko
On 19 August 2015 at 11:52, Mehdi Elaoufir <melaoufir@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Groovy people,
>
> I have business logic that is written in terms of small closure.
>
> I want to be able to combine as many closures as i want using logical
> operators &&, ..
>
> All these closures have a similar functional signature :
> (DomainObject,User) > boolean
>
> Say, for example these three closures :
>
> def isEnabled = {obj, user>user.enabled}
> def canAccessObject= {obj, user>obj.owner?.id==user.id}
> def isManager = {obj, user>user.hasRole('Manager')}
>
> I want to be able to have a closure with the same signature :
>
> def canProcessTransaction = isEnabled && canAccessObject  isManager
>
> assert canProcessTransaction(basket,userService.loggedInUser)
>
> Is there a Groovy way to do it?
>
>
> Best regards
