community-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From rgard...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r1135782 - /comdev/site/trunk/content/committers/lazyConsensus.mdtext
Date Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:44:43 GMT
Author: rgardler
Date: Tue Jun 14 20:44:43 2011
New Revision: 1135782

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135782&view=rev
Log:
initial lazy consensus doc

Added:
    comdev/site/trunk/content/committers/lazyConsensus.mdtext   (with props)

Added: comdev/site/trunk/content/committers/lazyConsensus.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/site/trunk/content/committers/lazyConsensus.mdtext?rev=1135782&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- comdev/site/trunk/content/committers/lazyConsensus.mdtext (added)
+++ comdev/site/trunk/content/committers/lazyConsensus.mdtext Tue Jun 14 20:44:43 2011
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+Title:     Lazy Consensus
+Notice:    Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+           or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+           distributed with this work for additional information
+           regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+           to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+           "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+           with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+           .
+             http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+           .
+           Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+           software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+           "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+           KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+           specific language governing permissions and limitations
+           under the License.
+
+The concept of "Lazy Consensus" is very important in our project. Lazy
+Consensus means that when you are convinced that you know what the community
+would like to see happen you can simply assume that you already have consensus
+and get on with the work. You don't have to insist people discuss and/or
+approve your plan, and you certainly don't need to call a vote to get approval.
+You just assume you have the communities support unless someone says otherwise.
+
+We have a time machine (Subversion), this means that as long as you commit 
+(or submit patches) early and often the community has plenty of opportunity 
+to indicate disapproval. If you believe the community will support your action
+you can operate on lazy consensus as long as you are prepared to roll back 
+any work should a valid objection is raised.
+
+## Avoiding Unnecessary Discussion
+
+The key thing about lazy consensus is that it's easier for people to agree,
+by doing nothing, than it is to object, which requires an
+alternative to be proposed. This has two effects, firstly people are less 
+likely to object for the sake of it and secondly it cuts down on the amount 
+of unnecessary mail traffic and discussion.
+
+Lazy consensus means we can avoid waiting for a community based decision 
+before proceeding. However, it does require everyone who cares for the health
+of the project to watch what is happening, as it is happening. Objecting too 
+far down the road will cause upset, but objecting (or asking for clarification 
+of intent) early is likely to be greeted with relief that someone is watching
+and cares.
+
+## Stating Lazy Consensus
+
+Sometimes a member of the community will believe a specific action is the correct 
+one for the community but are not sure enough to proceed with the work under the 
+lazy consensus model. In these circumstances they can state Lazy Consensus is in 
+operation.
+
+What this means is that they make a proposal and state that they will start 
+implementing it in 72 hours unless someone objects. 72 hours is chosen because
+it accounts for different timezones and non-apache commitments.
+
+In this approach the original proposal is not insisting that there is a discussion
+around their proposal, nor are they requesting that the community explicitly 
+supports their actions. However, this differs from assuming lazy consensus 
+since it allows space and time to [express support or objections][1] and corrections to 
+the proposal before work begins. 
+
+## Silence is consent
+
+People may choose to indicate their support for the actions taken with a +1 
+mail - quick and easy to read and reassuring for the implementer. However, 
+remember, in a lazy consensus world silence is the equivalent to support. This
+can take some time to get used to.
+
+  [1]: /rave/docs/governance/consensusBuilding.html
\ No newline at end of file

Propchange: comdev/site/trunk/content/committers/lazyConsensus.mdtext
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    svn:eol-style = native



Mime
View raw message