celix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Jansman <E...@jansman.eu>
Subject Re: Board report
Date Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:22:35 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Looks good to me.

Regards,

Erik

On 09-02-15 09:32, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> I've updated the report. Please take a look, if all is ok, I'll
> post it this evening or tomorrow. I've also added some in-line
> comments below.
> 
> ---- Celix is an OSGi like implementation in C with a distinct
> focus on interoperability between Java and C.
> 
> Activity In the last months there has been a lot of activity,
> issues have been filed and resolved. Also we are working on
> removing the usage of APR. Issues with the website have been fixed,
> a getting started guide has been added [1]. Wrt publicity, a talk
> about Celix was given at the FOSDEM 2015.
> 
> Statistics: * Last committer added: 2014-03-04 * Last PMC member
> added: 2014-07-17
> 
> * Mailing list activity in october - january: 93 messages on dev *
> Commits since october: 193 commits * Last release: 2014-02-24:
> Apache Celix 1.0.0 release
> 
> [1]: http://celix.apache.org/documentation/getting_started.html 
> ------
> 
> 
> 2015-02-05 9:40 GMT+01:00 Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnoltes@gmail.com>:
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Erik Jansman <Erik@jansman.eu>
>> wrote:
>>> Not sure if it should be here but I'll ask it anyway, what is
>>> the next big development goal?
>> 
>> Well big goal ... In my opinion removing APR and stabilizing is
>> the next goal.
>> 
> 
> I thinks once APR is removed we should make a new (2.0?) release.
> One item that needs to be discussed is wether we want to have an
> build option to still be able to maintain the old API (mostly the
> bundle_context providing a memory pool).
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> After that or probably parallel I expect some commits on remote 
>> services (IDL, code generation new protocol/serialization). Not
>> sure if this is mentioned before, but these coming changes are
>> done under the INAETICS research program [1][2]. When the time is
>> right I will post some more info / start a discussion.
>> 
>> I'm very interesting in this work. Not sure if there is already
>> some code
> being written, if so, why not do it directly in the Celix repo? So
> that other people can view/test it? If not, can this be done
> directly in the Celix repo? I'm not sure if the research project
> setup makes this possible.. So if there are objections to this, I'm
> looking forward to some patches/code donations!
> 
> Back to the subject of this thread, the report is imho complete, if
> there is still something missing, let me know! If more info is
> needed on the other subjects, please start a new mail thread.
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU2PrnAAoJEPdIdwtvIe9Qm9wP/j49fTeDwJglZss9hpKWP1He
MWJyOjeZHRkkGGbNV7t6mS1XAFRpw1hOcKSUtI7a6VEiFLlM8SsEnTxT54vaOTJR
NXPD/UXD+X4ClWnvDmOyrncPtwO7eT8G20bfjAY4Fh3LJLV1ImrH+VJ+VdOB8NWI
di8SYoK7wphCVAyvwlOWnVNYZ6+aXs1pS+Ec4zma2eoIQo/bkOuRu5bn9BcRDCuM
QhicwZe8goUOYtI4dr5GAvyv9nVH9cu2IGNv2rRm87ZcDRl/JgK1HJ0XDDr1GaPc
jfMXOFP2hmX33C7WfB1Q7lc7CmY/K0CXPTBft44dsT4TpIUot/TT7gnBFhip/cub
0BuiRLnlRsRSuKoiNN8viB5K06Pnqvk9fjD0EkfkqysOLYCdI3Xl9irHBbOICqQ1
yHHS+5lS9WG3uJcCrq4kAsdGIMSV6THpN633Hk7jSPirvwhXWTRCgmsgbj1xb8Qi
tjh72QxBa6V6RWkI3EWJNKvCHeSdJaWQuzTNhwbGMVeh8JO0GgnfIQevkwmnJSbV
Vsp74Idptzn23of28ojgf+sxLF2+3XrCsLu8pXsa84K3rl872Zz7ZLUPS527uH5I
AkElt/Sh4/GUxEQ2WWTy0GMSexiyKZCe4UPMAb2t6YdVPUi62o3GSGKc47vnU8Ve
0EIKkhbKKPMzawPOtKb4
=u/n7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message