From celix-dev-return-197-apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Jun 5 18:45:08 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BA05C41B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 18:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2152 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2012 18:45:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2114 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2012 18:45:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2105 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2012 18:45:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:45:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of a.broekhuis@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:45:00 +0000 Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so10664754obh.6 for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=W/3KgjHqrLRQqsoVs0COHMVvNqF3Ubu67aUoAyGwfdA=; b=Vpb8ruBlQReTSInyBItUdbOVZBQEiigbJE12L2b8DAeiafPB4GYGOCrZDVjby5Qluh lEde7mhYa+UmpZ6EHDHqXuDSE+4kjE/7qd2DlCIivH+JyIATe6fEx6uHvzIR/as5t/D6 iWEmbdonk4oVhC8ggmaR4Eq1OvnBSflI/e/ZvoDURWd8h0sRp7eE+uQCOPY1Qep+EWMa 6zDu4mGYpeiq2ZSpk86DNiCM38df12kjBVsA5vtOVl/M+rLaUKMf6L/90ef9MFKHdq61 7fPPM9Uuu6sUN0lIGv6kTca30npbr4ZUufvShjgHaVjUiBFSIvNX1m73HdjSRoZ/KB7L VWUw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.164.102 with SMTP id yp6mr17489473obb.66.1338921879706; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.65.97 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:44:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:44:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Native-OSGi] Usage of arrays vs collections From: Alexander Broekhuis To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f64354a059d6204c1be0bf2 --e89a8f64354a059d6204c1be0bf2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Rhys, > You might find SGLIB's "Level 1 API" fits the bill for C and also maps > reasonably well to C++. The download link off SGLIB's main website > [1] is broken but the files can be had from the project's Sourceforge > page [2]. It's licensing should not be a problem [3]. Thx for the links, I will check it out. But Celix already has a similar utils library now. The simplest for me would be to use that one for the Native-OSGi project. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Alexander Broekhuis --e89a8f64354a059d6204c1be0bf2--